Building comparison
head to head
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New EyesvsUnpacking
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Solving fixed item-combination puzzles inside a dark comic story.
Unpacking
Optimization · Pure Optimization
A zen object-placement game where reading spatial and narrative context determines where each item belongs.
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Unpacking leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New EyesUnpacking
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 1
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes
Pointing and clicking has no dexterity ceiling
Unpacking
Item placement requires light spatial judgment but no precision
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes
Characters are scripted comedy props
Unpacking
Solo meditative game with no opponent
Variance2 vs 1
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes
Solutions are hidden until discovered once
Unpacking
Item and room combinations are deterministic across playthroughs
Optimization5 vs 5
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Edna & Harvey: Harvey's New Eyes
Item-combination logic puzzles have single fixed answers
Unpacking
Understanding acceptable placement rules and story logic guides packing decisions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.