head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A genre-hopping adventure that evolves through gaming history as you play.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A real-time RPG carried by ascension-grid routing and magic crafting.
Evoland leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Final Fantasy XV leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Final Fantasy XV leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Evoland
Light Zelda-style action sections
Final Fantasy XV
Real-time combat, modest input demand
Final Fantasy XV leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Evoland
No adaptive opponent
Final Fantasy XV
Scripted enemies
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Evoland
Some random encounters in RPG segments
Final Fantasy XV
Loot and ascension variance
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Evoland
Short, fully mappable progression gimmick
Final Fantasy XV
Ascension grid, magic crafting, party planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.