head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A forgiving fantasy RPG testing light build and morality-system optimization.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A gentle turn-based system easily solved by build and gear choices.
Fable: The Lost Chapters leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); South Park: The Stick of Truth leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fable: The Lost Chapters
Forgiving combat needs little precision
South Park: The Stick of Truth
Timed attack and block prompts add light input demands
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fable: The Lost Chapters
Enemies and villagers run simple scripts
South Park: The Stick of Truth
Enemies follow fixed turn-based scripts
South Park: The Stick of Truth leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Fable: The Lost Chapters
The authored world holds few surprises after one pass
South Park: The Stick of Truth
Minor damage rolls; encounters are otherwise fixed
South Park: The Stick of Truth leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Fable: The Lost Chapters
Alignment, builds and economy are a gentle solvable layer
South Park: The Stick of Truth
Build, gear and ability choices comfortably solve every fight
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.