head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Mechanical football execution plus reading a human opponent's meta habits.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Tests shot timing and faking out human defenders amid item-driven chaos.
FIFA 19 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Mario Strikers Charged leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
FIFA 19 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
FIFA 19
Skill moves and timed finishing reward fast hands
Mario Strikers Charged
Timing tackles, charged shots and goalie deflections needs quick hands
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
FIFA 19
Ranked opponents adapt; baiting their defending is prediction
Mario Strikers Charged
Versus humans, faking shots and baiting tackles drives goals
Mario Strikers Charged leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
FIFA 19
Finishing RNG and deflections decide tight margins
Mario Strikers Charged
Items and stage hazards inject swingy chaos into matches
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
FIFA 19
Meta formations and chemistry are solvable homework
Mario Strikers Charged
Captain abilities and team builds reward knowing the systems
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.