head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Football sim testing execution and opponent reading under a studied tactical meta.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Tests shot timing and faking out human defenders amid item-driven chaos.
FIFA 21 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Mario Strikers Charged leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
FIFA 21
Skill moves and finishing mechanics demand practiced hands
Mario Strikers Charged
Timing tackles, charged shots and goalie deflections needs quick hands
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
FIFA 21
Outguessing a human's defensive shape and attacking patterns is central
Mario Strikers Charged
Versus humans, faking shots and baiting tackles drives goals
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
FIFA 21
Deflections, finishing RNG and pack luck colour outcomes
Mario Strikers Charged
Items and stage hazards inject swingy chaos into matches
FIFA 21 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
FIFA 21
Meta formations, custom tactics and squad building are studied deeply
Mario Strikers Charged
Captain abilities and team builds reward knowing the systems
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.