head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Football execution with finer dribble control, human prediction, and bounce luck.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Accessible large-scale shooting with light prediction against human players.
FIFA Soccer 10 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Star Wars Battlefront leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
FIFA Soccer 10 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
FIFA Soccer 10
360-degree dribbling raised the stick-skill ceiling
Star Wars Battlefront
Aimbot dominates blaster fights despite generous hitboxes
FIFA Soccer 10 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
FIFA Soccer 10
Outguessing a human defender's tackle timing is constant
Star Wars Battlefront
Human lobbies add modest positional prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
FIFA Soccer 10
Deflections and keeper randomness swing tight matches
Star Wars Battlefront
Power-up pickups and spawn flow inject chaos
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
FIFA Soccer 10
Formations, tactics and manager mode reward study
Star Wars Battlefront
Objective timing and pickup control reward learned routes
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.