head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
The poppy direct sequel to FFX where Yuna's trio swaps job dresspheres mid-battle across Spira.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A farm-life sim solved by season routing and profit optimization.
Final Fantasy X-2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Stardew Valley leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Final Fantasy X-2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Final Fantasy X-2
Active Time Battle rewards quick menuing slightly.
Stardew Valley
Trivial timing on fishing and combat
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy X-2
All enemies follow scripted AI routines.
Stardew Valley
No adaptive opponent exists
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy X-2
Drop rates and unknown encounters until mapped.
Stardew Valley
Crop luck and geode RNG matter modestly
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy X-2
Dressphere builds, garment grids, and completion routing dominate.
Stardew Valley
Routing seasons, profit loops, and bundles dominates
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.