head to head
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
JRPG where you program party AI through its gambit system.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A point-and-click horror finale built on solving fixed puzzles and codes.
Final Fantasy XII leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); True Fear: Forsaken Souls Part 3 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy XII
Gambits automate combat away from the hands
True Fear: Forsaken Souls Part 3
Point-and-click, no reflex demands
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy XII
Enemy AI is fixed and exploitable
True Fear: Forsaken Souls Part 3
Story scripted, no adaptive adversary
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy XII
Rare spawns and drop RNG
True Fear: Forsaken Souls Part 3
Fixed puzzles, minimal randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Final Fantasy XII
Programming gambit logic IS the gameplay
True Fear: Forsaken Souls Part 3
Solving puzzles and inventory chains drives progress
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.