head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A tactical RPG where careful positioning and managing randomized combat odds decides survival.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A d20 Star Wars RPG where Force power selection and alignment routing define clear optimal paths.
Fire Emblem Fates: Birthright leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Knights of the Old Republic leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Knights of the Old Republic leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Fire Emblem Fates: Birthright
no real-time physical skill, turn-based
Knights of the Old Republic
Pseudo-turn-based d20 combat removes all twitch; timing aids exist but minor
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fire Emblem Fates: Birthright
AI is scripted, no true adaptation
Knights of the Old Republic
All enemies follow scripted AI behaviour trees without player modelling
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fire Emblem Fates: Birthright
hit chance rolls are heavily randomized
Knights of the Old Republic
Loot rolls and pazaak draws provide hidden information layers
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Fire Emblem Fates: Birthright
permadeath tactics and builds near-solvable
Knights of the Old Republic
Force power selection, feat prerequisites and light/dark routing are systematically solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.