head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A compulsive grind-and-automate sandbox where optimizing the resource loop is the whole game.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Fifth-generation reboot with an entirely new monster roster and stronger story.
Forager leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Pokémon Black leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Forager leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Forager
Click-and-walk inputs, no dexterity ceiling
Pokémon Black
Menu battles, zero reflex demand
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Forager
No opponents
Pokémon Black
Story trainers follow fixed logic
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Forager
Minor drop randomness, quickly irrelevant
Pokémon Black
Encounter and damage-roll randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Forager
Pure economy loop: automate, expand, compound
Pokémon Black
All-new dex forces fresh team optimization
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.