head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A top-down co-op shooter testing aim and upgrade optimization against alien swarms.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
An open-chapter survival horror game where upgrade planning and systematic area sweeping drive success.
From Space leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); The Evil Within 2 leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
From Space
Twin-stick aiming and dodging swarms is core
The Evil Within 2
Open-zone combat demands solid aim and positioning
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
From Space
Aliens are scripted/random, not adaptive minds
The Evil Within 2
Enemies are scripted; no adaptive opponent
From Space leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
From Space
Random spawns and drops add chaos
The Evil Within 2
Collectibles are hidden; minor supply variance in open zones
The Evil Within 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
From Space
Weapon upgrades and squad coordination reward planning
The Evil Within 2
Upgrade system, open-area routing and crafting are fully optimisable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.