head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
An open-world samurai adventure trading honor for guerrilla tactics across feudal Tsushima.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A turn-based RPG where timed button presses and strategic builds both matter.
Ghost of Tsushima leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Ghost of Tsushima leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Ghost of Tsushima
Parry and stance timing carry duels and standoffs
Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
timed hit inputs require precision
Ghost of Tsushima leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Ghost of Tsushima
Mongol AI is scripted, not adaptive
Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
scripted enemies, no adaptation
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Ghost of Tsushima
Encounters are largely deterministic
Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
minimal randomness in battles
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Ghost of Tsushima
Stance matchups, charms, and gear are solvable systems
Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
builds and turn strategy near-solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.