head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Precision mouse control over janky minigolf physics, refined hole by hole.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A cinematic open-world western leaning on shooting feel and atmosphere.
Golf It! leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Red Dead Redemption 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Golf It! leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Golf It!
Mouse-pull power and angle control decide every putt
Red Dead Redemption 2
Gunplay and Dead Eye reward aim and timing.
Red Dead Redemption 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Golf It!
Friends play in parallel - no interaction to predict
Red Dead Redemption 2
Enemies use scripted AI patterns, not adaptation.
Golf It! leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Golf It!
Janky physics and unknown custom maps add chaos
Red Dead Redemption 2
Some hunting and weather randomness, lightly hidden.
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Golf It!
Line and power knowledge per hole converges with repetition
Red Dead Redemption 2
Loadouts and routes solvable but loose.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.