Building comparison
head to head
GorogoavsPost Mortem
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.
Gorogoa
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Hand-drawn puzzle where overlapping illustrated panels unlock impossible connections.
Post Mortem
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Piecing together a scripted murder conspiracy from hidden clues.
Gorogoa leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Post Mortem leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
GorogoaPost Mortem
Axis by axis
Execution0 vs 0
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gorogoa
Dragging panels requires no skill
Post Mortem
Point-and-click interface, zero dexterity
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gorogoa
No opponent exists
Post Mortem
Suspects follow scripted dialogue trees
Variance2 vs 3
Post Mortem leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Gorogoa
Solutions unknown on first encounter only
Post Mortem
The conspiracy is hidden information revealed by investigation
Optimization7 vs 6
Gorogoa leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Gorogoa
Each panel arrangement has one elegant solvable answer
Post Mortem
Piecing fixed clues into the solution is the game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.