head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A sprawling open-world crime epic with RPG-style character stats across a whole state.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A punishing Soviet off-road logging sim about dragging timber through near-impassable mud.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); MudRunner leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
MudRunner leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Flying school and drive-bys need decent hands
MudRunner
Careful throttle, diff-lock and winch control matter constantly.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Gang AI is scripted, never adaptive
MudRunner
No opponent of any kind.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Territory wars and traffic add light randomness
MudRunner
Deforming mud behaves unpredictably until mapped.
MudRunner leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Stats, gym, weapon skill, and routes reward systematic play
MudRunner
Fuel, load and route planning across the map is the core test.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.