head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A sprawling open-world crime epic with RPG-style character stats across a whole state.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A quest-stuffed 2.5D platformer where a pink-haired wild boy bites evil pigs to undo their curses.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Flying school and drive-bys need decent hands
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Grab-and-throw platforming with moderate timing.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Gang AI is scripted, never adaptive
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Scripted pigs, no adaptation.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Territory wars and traffic add light randomness
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Fixed events; quests are deterministic.
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Stats, gym, weapon skill, and routes reward systematic play
Tomba! 2: The Evil Swine Return
Interlocking 130-plus event quests reward sequencing.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.