Building comparison
head to head
Gunman ClivevsSuper Mario 64
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.
Gunman Clive
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Old-school platforming execution through short, fixed western levels.
Super Mario 64
Execution · Practiced Mastery
A test of 3D movement control with a deep routing layer underneath.
Gunman Clive leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Super Mario 64 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Gunman CliveSuper Mario 64
Axis by axis
Execution7 vs 7
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gunman Clive
Tight jumps and duck-shoot timing carry all sixteen levels
Super Mario 64
Perfect analog inputs trivialise precise jumps, dives and wall-kicks
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Gunman Clive
Bandits and bosses run fixed patterns
Super Mario 64
Solo platformer - no adaptive opponent anywhere
Variance0 vs 1
Super Mario 64 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Gunman Clive
Levels never change between attempts
Super Mario 64
Star locations and level layouts are fixed once seen
Optimization4 vs 5
Super Mario 64 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Gunman Clive
Boss pattern learning and weapon upgrades round out clears
Super Mario 64
Star routing and movement tech form a deep solvable layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.