head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Tests arcade sports timing in a licensed fantasy sport with swingy Snitch catches.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Foundational ice hockey sim testing stick timing and exploiting goalie angles.
Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); NHL Hockey leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
NHL Hockey leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup
Timing passes, tackles and Snitch chases needs moderate dexterity
NHL Hockey
Skating angles, pass timing and shot placement decide goals
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup
Versus a friend, faking plays adds light prediction
NHL Hockey
Against a human, baiting checks and goalie reads matter
Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup
Snitch appearances and combo opportunities add swing
NHL Hockey
Puck bounces add light physical randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Harry Potter: Quidditch World Cup
Special move charging and team choice reward system knowledge
NHL Hockey
Exploitable AI angles and line strategy are mappable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.