Building comparison
head to head
Hitman 2 (2018)vsHitman: Codename 47
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Hitman 2 (2018)
Optimization · Pure Optimization
More giant clockwork sandboxes where mapping NPC schedules is the real skill.
Hitman: Codename 47
Optimization · Pure Optimization
The original stealth assassination sim where each mission is a clockwork puzzle.
Hitman 2 (2018) leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Hitman: Codename 47 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Hitman 2 (2018)Hitman: Codename 47
Axis by axis
Execution3 vs 4
Hitman: Codename 47 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Hitman 2 (2018)
Minimal dexterity needed with a solid plan
Hitman: Codename 47
Stiff aiming and unforgiving stealth movement
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Hitman 2 (2018)
Clockwork NPC loops, nothing adapts
Hitman: Codename 47
Guards follow fixed scripted patrols
Variance2 vs 2
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Hitman 2 (2018)
Mission stories hidden until explored
Hitman: Codename 47
First-run guard routes and triggers are unknown
Optimization9 vs 8
Hitman 2 (2018) leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Hitman 2 (2018)
Routing, disguises, and unlocks converge on solved runs
Hitman: Codename 47
Learning the level clockwork is the whole game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.