head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Robot-dinosaur hunting that rewards weak-point study and ranged precision.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A WWII shooter taking a Marine through the Pacific island campaign.
Horizon Zero Dawn leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Horizon Zero Dawn
Bow aiming and dodge timing matter.
Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault
Recoil-heavy gunplay in jungle firefights
Horizon Zero Dawn leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Horizon Zero Dawn
Machines follow fixed patterns, not adapting.
Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault
Squad and enemy AI follow scripts
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Horizon Zero Dawn
Some loot and patrol randomness.
Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault
Jungle ambushes surprise only first time
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Horizon Zero Dawn
Weak points, traps, builds fully solvable.
Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault
Health-medic economy and routes are learnable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.