head to head
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A 3rd Edition ruleset combat puzzle where multi-classing and feat selection unlock dominant strategies.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A faithful D&D 5E dungeon crawl where concentration management and class synergies define optimal parties.
Icewind Dale II leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Solasta: Crown of the Magister leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Icewind Dale II
Real-time-with-pause negates twitch requirements
Solasta: Crown of the Magister
D&D 5E turn-based rules fully automate dice; no twitch exists
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Icewind Dale II
Scripted enemy routines offer nothing to read or predict adaptively
Solasta: Crown of the Magister
All dungeon enemies follow scripted AI behaviour and patrol routes
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Icewind Dale II
3E feat combinations and hidden enemy resistances create unknown-information layers
Solasta: Crown of the Magister
Roll randomness and hidden enemy positions add unknowns to each encounter
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Icewind Dale II
3rd Edition feat optimization and multi-class architecture dominate success
Solasta: Crown of the Magister
5E class synergies, concentration management and high-ground exploitation are solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.