Building comparison
head to head
Indiana Jones and the Fate of AtlantisvsPortal 2
Neither is simply harder - they are hard in different places. Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis demands more variance; Portal 2 demands more execution.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Optimization · Pure Optimization
LucasArts adventure sending Indy down three routes toward Atlantis.
Portal 2
Optimization · Pure Optimization
A first-person puzzle game where seeing the solution is the whole skill.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Portal 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Indiana Jones and the Fate of AtlantisPortal 2
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 3
Portal 2 leans clearly harder on execution.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Pointing and clicking, light fistfight option
Portal 2
Portal placement requires some precision but timing is lenient.
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
No adaptive opposition
Portal 2
No opponent; puzzles are static.
Variance2 vs 0
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis leans clearly harder on variance.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Solutions hidden until reasoned out
Portal 2
Puzzles are deterministic with no randomness.
Optimization8 vs 9
Portal 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis
Three-path puzzle chains reward deduction
Portal 2
Solving the puzzle's logic IS the entire game.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.