Building comparison
head to head
inFamous 2vsZombies Ate My Neighbors
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
inFamous 2
Execution · Practiced Mastery
Superhero sequel adding melee combat and a karma-split power arsenal in New Marais.
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Execution · Practiced Mastery
A campy 16-bit run-and-gun about rescuing neighbors from B-movie monsters.
inFamous 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Zombies Ate My Neighbors leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
inFamous 2Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Axis by axis
Execution5 vs 6
Zombies Ate My Neighbors leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
inFamous 2
Faster combat with melee and aimed powers
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Dodging monsters while sniping with squirt guns
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
inFamous 2
Scripted enemy factions, no adaptation
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Monster movie AI is fully patterned
Variance1 vs 2
Zombies Ate My Neighbors leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
inFamous 2
Static world, fixed encounters
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Victim placement varies slightly per level
Optimization5 vs 5
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
inFamous 2
Karma-gated power trees shape the run
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Weapon-versus-monster matchups and level routing
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.