head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A grimy camcorder-styled shooter dragging two criminals across Shanghai.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Cinematic treasure-hunting where set pieces outshine systems.
Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Uncharted 4: A Thief's End leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days
Scrappy close-range gunfights demand steady aim
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End
Cover shooting and platforming reward timing.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days
Multiplayer betrayal modes add slight human reads
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End
Scripted enemy AI throughout.
Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days
Fixed encounters with chaotic feel
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End
Essentially no randomness.
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days
Cover routes and arsenal knowledge
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End
Few systems to optimize beyond difficulty.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.