head to head
Kerbal Space Program asks more than Portal 2, and the gap is execution.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Rocket engineering sandbox about orbital mechanics.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A first-person puzzle game where seeing the solution is the whole skill.
Kerbal Space Program leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Portal 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Kerbal Space Program leans clearly harder on execution.
Kerbal Space Program
Manual piloting, docking precision
Portal 2
Portal placement requires some precision but timing is lenient.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Kerbal Space Program
No adaptive opponents
Portal 2
No opponent; puzzles are static.
Kerbal Space Program leans clearly harder on variance.
Kerbal Space Program
Light reentry and physics variance
Portal 2
Puzzles are deterministic with no randomness.
Kerbal Space Program leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Kerbal Space Program
Rocket design, delta-v budget, mission planning
Portal 2
Solving the puzzle's logic IS the entire game.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.