head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
LEGO romp through the original Indy trilogy's set pieces and puzzles.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Painterly cinematic puzzle platformer about a girl and her cat-like companion.
LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Planet of Lana leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Planet of Lana leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures
Whip swings and brawls, very forgiving
Planet of Lana
Gentle platforming and chase sequences
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures
Scripted foes and traps
Planet of Lana
Machines follow scripted patterns
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures
Everything placed deterministically
Planet of Lana
Fully authored puzzles
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures
Item and character gating across replayable levels
Planet of Lana
Companion-command puzzles have single solutions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.