head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A forgiving co-op collect-a-thon that tests completionist routing, not skill ceilings.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Painterly cinematic puzzle platformer about a girl and her cat-like companion.
LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Planet of Lana leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Planet of Lana leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Blaster battles and platforming stay deliberately forgiving
Planet of Lana
Gentle platforming and chase sequences
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens
First Order enemies are scripted set dressing
Planet of Lana
Machines follow scripted patterns
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Multi-build choices are visible options, not hidden information
Planet of Lana
Fully authored puzzles
Planet of Lana leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Hundred-percenting collectibles is the only system to solve
Planet of Lana
Companion-command puzzles have single solutions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.