head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A turn-based JRPG carried by job, gear, and bond-routing optimization.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A farm-life sim solved by season routing and profit optimization.
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Stardew Valley leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth
Turn-based with positioning, low input demand
Stardew Valley
Trivial timing on fishing and combat
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth
Scripted enemies
Stardew Valley
No adaptive opponent exists
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth
Drop and ability rolls
Stardew Valley
Crop luck and geode RNG matter modestly
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth
Job, gear, and bond routing rewarded
Stardew Valley
Routing seasons, profit loops, and bundles dominates
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.