Building comparison
head to head
LimbovsRochard
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Limbo
Execution · Practiced Mastery
A monochrome puzzle-platformer about a boy lost in limbo.
Rochard
Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Solving fixed gravity-manipulation puzzles with light physics platforming.
Limbo leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Rochard leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
LimboRochard
Axis by axis
Execution5 vs 4
Limbo leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Limbo
Tight platforming with trial-and-error.
Rochard
Light platforming and aimed throws, rarely demanding
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Limbo
Hazards are scripted.
Rochard
Guards follow simple scripts, never adapt
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Limbo
No randomness.
Rochard
Puzzle rooms are fixed and visible
Optimization5 vs 6
Rochard leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Limbo
Puzzles have fixed solutions.
Rochard
Gravity-manipulation puzzles each have a findable solution
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.