Building comparison
head to head
M.U.S.H.A.vsSuper Contra
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.
M.U.S.H.A.
Execution · Practiced Mastery
Compile's mecha vertical shmup for the Genesis, famed for speed and configurable option pods.
Super Contra
Execution · Practiced Mastery
Memorising spawn patterns then executing them flawlessly under one-hit-death rules.
M.U.S.H.A. leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Super Contra leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
M.U.S.H.A.Super Contra
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 8
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
M.U.S.H.A.
Fast vertical dodging through dense fire tests the hands.
Super Contra
One-hit deaths demand precise dodging and constant accurate fire
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
M.U.S.H.A.
Enemies follow fixed choreography.
Super Contra
Alien waves follow fixed spawn scripts
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
M.U.S.H.A.
Stages are fixed and memorisable.
Super Contra
Nothing random once spawn patterns are memorised
Optimization6 vs 6
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
M.U.S.H.A.
Option formations and weapon choice reward system mastery.
Super Contra
Memorising spawns and weapon routes is half the run
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.