head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Two Spider-Men, faster traversal, and deeper combo systems.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A campy 16-bit run-and-gun about rescuing neighbors from B-movie monsters.
Marvel's Spider-Man 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Zombies Ate My Neighbors leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Marvel's Spider-Man 2
Symbiote and dual-hero combat demands inputs.
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Dodging monsters while sniping with squirt guns
Marvel's Spider-Man 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Marvel's Spider-Man 2
Enemies scripted, not modeling player.
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Monster movie AI is fully patterned
Zombies Ate My Neighbors leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Marvel's Spider-Man 2
Light open-world randomness.
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Victim placement varies slightly per level
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Marvel's Spider-Man 2
Expanded skill trees and gadget combos solvable.
Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Weapon-versus-monster matchups and level routing
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.