head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A rally-focused tennis game where reading human opponent positioning is as important as clean strokes.

Execution · Competitive PvP
The peak-era Konami football game prized for weighty, skill-driven match play.
Matchpoint Tennis Championships leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Pro Evolution Soccer 6 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Matchpoint Tennis Championships
Stroke timing and court positioning demand consistent precision
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
First touch, through balls, and dribbles demand precise control
Pro Evolution Soccer 6 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Matchpoint Tennis Championships
Human opponent shot selection creates real prediction demands
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
Versus matches are constant feint and positioning prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Matchpoint Tennis Championships
Minimal RNG in ball physics
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
Deflections and keeper spills add light randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Matchpoint Tennis Championships
Serve patterns and rally tactics have optimal solutions
Pro Evolution Soccer 6
Formations and player roles are studyable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.