head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A modern-war reboot following Tier 1 operators in Afghanistan.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A top-down soccer game blending arcade play with deep team management.
Medal of Honor (2010) leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Sensible World of Soccer '96/'97 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Modern gunplay in campaign and multiplayer
Sensible World of Soccer '96/'97
Fast passing and shooting timing on the pitch matters
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Competitive MP adds human prediction
Sensible World of Soccer '96/'97
Versus play rewards predicting a human opponent
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Scripted campaign, modest MP randomness
Sensible World of Soccer '96/'97
Little randomness once ratings are known
Sensible World of Soccer '96/'97 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Loadouts and map control are learnable
Sensible World of Soccer '96/'97
Transfers, tactics and squad management deepen the career
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.