head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A modern-war reboot following Tier 1 operators in Afghanistan.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Co-op-focused action sequel hurling Titus against Tyranid swarms with parry-heavy melee combat.
Medal of Honor (2010) leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Modern gunplay in campaign and multiplayer
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Parry, dodge and gun-strike timing against swarms
Medal of Honor (2010) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Competitive MP adds human prediction
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
PvP Eternal War adds some human prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Scripted campaign, modest MP randomness
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Tyranid swarm spawns vary run to run
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Medal of Honor (2010)
Loadouts and map control are learnable
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Class builds and perk loadouts reward planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.