head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Variance · Light / Casual
A short, unsettling visual novel about intrusive thoughts with no skill test.

Reads · Light / Casual
A linear narrative visual novel testing emotional and story engagement, not mechanics.
Milk Inside a Bag of Milk Inside a Bag of Milk leans Variance (Light / Casual); The House in Fata Morgana: A Requiem for Innocence leans Reads (Light / Casual).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Milk Inside a Bag of Milk Inside a Bag of Milk
no physical skill demand at all
The House in Fata Morgana: A Requiem for Innocence
Reading text needs no physical skill
The House in Fata Morgana: A Requiem for Innocence leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Milk Inside a Bag of Milk Inside a Bag of Milk
no opponent of any kind
The House in Fata Morgana: A Requiem for Innocence
Characters scripted, no adaptive opponent
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Milk Inside a Bag of Milk Inside a Bag of Milk
branching text has minor unpredictability
The House in Fata Morgana: A Requiem for Innocence
Narrative authored, no randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Milk Inside a Bag of Milk Inside a Bag of Milk
barely any systems to solve
The House in Fata Morgana: A Requiem for Innocence
Almost no systems; it is a linear story
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Milk Inside a Bag of Milk Inside a Bag of Milk →
full breakdown
The House in Fata Morgana: A Requiem for Innocence →