head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
An open sandbox where mastering systems and infrastructure replaces twitch skill.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Lane defense classic about managing a sun economy against shambling waves.
Minecraft leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Plants vs. Zombies leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Minecraft leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Minecraft
Combat and movement are forgiving and simple.
Plants vs. Zombies
Clicking to plant, minimal pressure
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Minecraft
Mobs follow fixed AI; no adaptive opposition.
Plants vs. Zombies
Zombie waves follow set compositions
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Minecraft
World generation and loot tables introduce randomness.
Plants vs. Zombies
Wave timing and lane pressure vary mildly
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Minecraft
Resource routing, redstone, and farms define long-term progress.
Plants vs. Zombies
Sun economy and lane setups are near-solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.