head to head
Star Citizen asks more than Monster Hunter: World, and the gap is reads.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Breakout Monster Hunter where learning each beast's moveset turns terror into routine.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Ambitious online space sim with deep systems.
Monster Hunter: World leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Star Citizen leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Monster Hunter: World leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Monster Hunter: World
Deliberate weapon timing against huge movesets
Star Citizen
Demanding flight and FPS inputs
Star Citizen leans clearly harder on reads.
Monster Hunter: World
Monsters are learnable scripts, never adaptive
Star Citizen
PvP encounters reward reading pilots
Star Citizen leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Monster Hunter: World
Decoration drops are notorious RNG
Star Citizen
Server instability and event RNG
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Monster Hunter: World
Knowing the monster and building counters is the game
Star Citizen
Ship loadouts, cargo routes, career grind
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.