head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
An arcade street football game balancing input timing with opponent reads.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Accessible large-scale shooting with light prediction against human players.
NFL Street 3 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Star Wars Battlefront leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
NFL Street 3
Timing trick moves, passes and tackles demands control
Star Wars Battlefront
Aimbot dominates blaster fights despite generous hitboxes
NFL Street 3 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
NFL Street 3
Human opponents require reading play calls and movement
Star Wars Battlefront
Human lobbies add modest positional prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
NFL Street 3
Physics and catch outcomes add randomness
Star Wars Battlefront
Power-up pickups and spawn flow inject chaos
NFL Street 3 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
NFL Street 3
Team building, style points and play strategy run underneath
Star Wars Battlefront
Objective timing and pickup control reward learned routes
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.