head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Sumi-e Zelda-like where a wolf goddess paints the world back to life.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A narrative action RPG where build planning matters more than reflex execution.
Okami leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Okami leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Okami
Brush strokes and combat timing, forgiving
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Combat timing matters but generous dodges forgive sloppy play.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Okami
Demons follow fixed patterns
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Enemies use fixed AI behaviours; no adaptation.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Okami
Authored world with no randomness
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Loot rolls and minor combat variance only.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Okami
Brush technique use, upgrades, and exploration
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Builds, alchemy, and quest routing reward planning.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.