head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A beloved turn-based RPG with theatrical combat.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A streamlined Kanto remake blending classic battles with Pokemon GO-style motion-throw catching.
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu! leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door
Action commands and stylish moves
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Motion-controlled ball throws add light timing skill
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door
Scripted enemy AI
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Trainers are scripted; minimal PvP focus
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door
Audience and badge effects
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Catch rolls and wild spawns bring luck
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door
Badge builds and partner tactics
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Simplified team building still decides battles
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.