head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Stylish JRPG where phantom thieves steal hearts on a tightly optimized school calendar.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Hoenn's definitive version, crowned by the strategy-heavy Battle Frontier.
Persona 5 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Pokémon Emerald leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Persona 5 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Persona 5
Stylish menus, not reflexes
Pokémon Emerald
Turn-based commands only
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Persona 5
Palace enemies use fixed weaknesses
Pokémon Emerald
Battle Frontier AI is fixed-policy
Persona 5 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Persona 5
Fusion alerts and negotiation rolls
Pokémon Emerald
Encounter RNG and Frontier hax
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Persona 5
Confidant calendar routing and baton-pass weakness chains
Pokémon Emerald
EVs, movesets, and Frontier strategy run deep
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.