head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A streamlined Kanto remake blending classic battles with Pokemon GO-style motion-throw catching.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A perk-driven sci-fi RPG won by flaw selection and dialogue routing.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu! leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Outer Worlds leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
The Outer Worlds leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Motion-controlled ball throws add light timing skill
The Outer Worlds
FPS-lite with time-dilation aim
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Trainers are scripted; minimal PvP focus
The Outer Worlds
Scripted enemies
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu! leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Catch rolls and wild spawns bring luck
The Outer Worlds
Loot rolls, dialogue check variance
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Simplified team building still decides battles
The Outer Worlds
Perks, flaws, dialogue routing rewarded
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.