head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A streamlined Kanto remake blending classic battles with Pokemon GO-style motion-throw catching.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Open-world detective work testing evidence deduction without hand-holding.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu! leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Sinking City leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Motion-controlled ball throws add light timing skill
The Sinking City
Clunky combat is deliberately undemanding
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu! leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Trainers are scripted; minimal PvP focus
The Sinking City
Monsters and citizens follow fixed scripts
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Catch rolls and wild spawns bring luck
The Sinking City
Case clues are hidden information until investigated
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu! leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Pokemon: Let's Go, Pikachu!
Simplified team building still decides battles
The Sinking City
Cross-referencing evidence and city archives is the deduction core
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.