head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Team building and type-matchup optimization through a scripted island campaign.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
Managing willpower resources and armor-strip sequencing under narrative-driven attrition.
Pokémon Moon leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Banner Saga leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
The Banner Saga leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Pokémon Moon
Turn-based menus require no dexterity
The Banner Saga
Turn-based; willpower spend timing is the sole execution nuance
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pokémon Moon
Scripted trials and trainers; competitive play is a niche mode
The Banner Saga
AI follows predictable threat-targeting logic
The Banner Saga leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Pokémon Moon
Encounter tables, catch rolls and crits are mappable RNG
The Banner Saga
Armor/strength interaction and random narrative outcomes create variance
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pokémon Moon
Team composition and type math are the solvable core
The Banner Saga
Willpower economy and armor-strip sequencing are learnable solutions
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.