Building comparison
head to head
Pokémon Ruby VersionvsPortal 2
Neither is simply harder - they are hard in different places. Pokémon Ruby Version demands more variance; Portal 2 demands more execution.
Pokémon Ruby Version
Optimization · Pure Optimization
Team-building optimisation against fixed trainers with mapped RNG.
Portal 2
Optimization · Pure Optimization
A first-person puzzle game where seeing the solution is the whole skill.
Pokémon Ruby Version leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Portal 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Pokémon Ruby VersionPortal 2
Axis by axis
Execution0 vs 3
Portal 2 leans clearly harder on execution.
Pokémon Ruby Version
Turn selection requires no dexterity
Portal 2
Portal placement requires some precision but timing is lenient.
Reads1 vs 0
Pokémon Ruby Version leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Pokémon Ruby Version
Scripted trainers never adapt to your strategy
Portal 2
No opponent; puzzles are static.
Variance3 vs 0
Pokémon Ruby Version leans clearly harder on variance.
Pokémon Ruby Version
Encounter, catch and crit rolls are quickly mapped
Portal 2
Puzzles are deterministic with no randomness.
Optimization8 vs 9
Portal 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Pokémon Ruby Version
Abilities and natures deepen an already solvable type system
Portal 2
Solving the puzzle's logic IS the entire game.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.