head to head
Neither is simply harder - they are hard in different places. Portal 2 demands more execution; The Great Ace Attorney 2: Resolve demands more variance.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A first-person puzzle game where seeing the solution is the whole skill.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Courtroom logic puzzles testing deduction of fixed contradictions inside a scripted story.
Portal 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Great Ace Attorney 2: Resolve leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Portal 2 leans clearly harder on execution.
Portal 2
Portal placement requires some precision but timing is lenient.
The Great Ace Attorney 2: Resolve
Presenting evidence takes no physical skill
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Portal 2
No opponent; puzzles are static.
The Great Ace Attorney 2: Resolve
Witnesses are scripted; contradictions never adapt to you
The Great Ace Attorney 2: Resolve leans clearly harder on variance.
Portal 2
Puzzles are deterministic with no randomness.
The Great Ace Attorney 2: Resolve
Case truths are hidden only until the script reveals them
Portal 2 leans clearly harder on optimization.
Portal 2
Solving the puzzle's logic IS the entire game.
The Great Ace Attorney 2: Resolve
Each trial is a fixed logic chain with one solution
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.