head to head
Neither is simply harder - they are hard in different places. Portal 2 demands more execution; The Inner World demands more variance.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A first-person puzzle game where seeing the solution is the whole skill.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Classic item-combination puzzle solving in a hand-drawn world.
Portal 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Inner World leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Portal 2 leans clearly harder on execution.
Portal 2
Portal placement requires some precision but timing is lenient.
The Inner World
Pointing and clicking, no dexterity
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Portal 2
No opponent; puzzles are static.
The Inner World
Asposia's characters are scripted
The Inner World leans clearly harder on variance.
Portal 2
Puzzles are deterministic with no randomness.
The Inner World
Puzzle states hidden until explored, then fixed
Portal 2 leans clearly harder on optimization.
Portal 2
Solving the puzzle's logic IS the entire game.
The Inner World
Combining items through fixed puzzle logic is the game
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.