head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A cycling management sim about running a professional cycling team through races.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A farm-life sim solved by season routing and profit optimization.
Pro Cycling Manager 2014 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Stardew Valley leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pro Cycling Manager 2014
no direct physical control, management sim
Stardew Valley
Trivial timing on fishing and combat
Pro Cycling Manager 2014 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Pro Cycling Manager 2014
rival team strategies vary slightly
Stardew Valley
No adaptive opponent exists
Pro Cycling Manager 2014 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Pro Cycling Manager 2014
weather and race incident randomness
Stardew Valley
Crop luck and geode RNG matter modestly
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Pro Cycling Manager 2014
training, tactics, and race-plan mastery
Stardew Valley
Routing seasons, profit loops, and bundles dominates
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.