head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Gentleman puzzler solves a village full of standalone brainteasers.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A folk horror adventure about an antiquarian unearthing something best left buried on the moors.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Excavation of Hob's Barrow leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
Stylus taps only; no dexterity pressure at all
The Excavation of Hob's Barrow
Pure point-and-click pacing
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
No opponent, adaptive or otherwise
The Excavation of Hob's Barrow
No adaptive opponent
The Excavation of Hob's Barrow leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
Puzzle answers are hidden until reasoned out, then fixed
The Excavation of Hob's Barrow
Dread comes from unknowns that vanish on replay
Professor Layton and the Curious Village leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Professor Layton and the Curious Village
Every brainteaser has one clean solvable answer
The Excavation of Hob's Barrow
Linear puzzles with fixed solutions throughout
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Professor Layton and the Curious Village →
full breakdown
The Excavation of Hob's Barrow →