head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A forgiving platformer testing light execution and exploration routing through fixed level designs.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
A narrative action RPG where build planning matters more than reflex execution.
Psychonauts 2 leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Psychonauts 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Psychonauts 2
Moderate platforming and combat timing, forgiving by design
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Combat timing matters but generous dodges forgive sloppy play.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Psychonauts 2
Solo adventure with no adaptive opponent anywhere
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Enemies use fixed AI behaviours; no adaptation.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Psychonauts 2
Level layouts and collectibles are fixed once seen
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Loot rolls and minor combat variance only.
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Psychonauts 2
Routing collectibles and matching psychic powers to encounters
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Builds, alchemy, and quest routing reward planning.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.